I am having the hardest time getting shoes for my 21 mos (yes I posted before about ankle supports). I find a pair of stride rite shoes, very orthopedic looking, closed toe, but have...
(more)
ankle support, they were also $45 which is ridiculous for a pair of shoes she'll grow out of in a few months. I also got some others which are ecco and feel nicer (softer insole, support) but do not have a closed heel (got them at a discount for $30) and finally, payless sandals, similar to the stride rites but no ankle support, they were only $15...what would you pick?
posted March 30th, 2009 at 9:19am in
ToddlerNOTE: YouBeMom.com may earn a commission on links to Amazon.com and other third party retailers in the post. See
Affiliate Disclosure for details.
11 Replies (log in or sign up to post a comment)
- I would do stride rite b/c you have no idea how fast her feet will grow (#1 grew fast, #2 is still in a small size). They are the best made ones and I would choose those. 3-30-2009 9:20am
- do not skimp on your toddler's shoes. You can buy them crappy cheap ones once they are 4-5 yo. 3-30-2009 9:20am
- I like stride rite or see kai run 3-30-2009 9:20am
- Well, my DS has PT issues and IMO stride rite are the best, most supportive shoes. Worth the extra $$ 3-30-2009 9:21am
- Stride Rite. Expensive, but especially for children that age, they should have good shoes. 3-30-2009 9:21am
- This is the time to buy your toddler expensive shoes. It's very important for the development of their feet. 3-30-2009 9:23am
- payless is stride rite now 3-30-2009 9:23am
- what do you mean? 3-30-2009 9:24am
- op: thanks everyone! you just made up my mind, I'll stick with the stride rite, I know they are good shoes and worth it. i wish my dh would see that but all he thinks about is how...(more) 3-30-2009 9:24am
- just tell him you will need 2-3 pairs of the cheap ones and only 1 pair of stride rite. 3-30-2009 9:25am
- np: Yes, you can tell him how as a toddler my son would need at least 2 pair of Target sneakers before he outgrew them b/c the quality was so crappy. 3-30-2009 9:26am
share
twitter
email
print